Go to My
Training Center

Forgot your password?
What is My Training Center?

VAM: Effects of Gradient & Altitude
By: Michele Ferrari
Published: 19 Jun 2009

When evaluating the VAM of a certain climbing performance we need to consider wind, drafting, asphalt conditions but also average SLOPE GRADIENT of the climb and the ALTITUDES at the start and end of the ascent.

There is quite a difference between a VAM obtained on an average gradient of 10% than one with the same value but obtained over a climb at 7%.
Over the years I have been putting together and using a simple formula which is useful when comparing VAM's expressed over different gradients.
For example, a VAM=1800 m/h corresponds to a different value in watt/kg, depending on the average gradient of the climb:

- gradient 11% 1800/3.1 = 5.80 w/kg
- gradient 10% 1800/3.0 = 6.00 w/kg
- gradient 9% 1800/2.9 = 6.20 w/kg
- gradient 8% 1800/2.8 = 6.42 w/kg
- gradient 7% 1800/2.7 = 6.66 w/kg
- gradient 6% 1800/2.6 = 6.92 w/kg

It is therefore simply enough to subdivide the VAM value with a certain number, between 2.6 up to 3.1, in accordance with the steepness of the climb (from 6% to 11%).

At higher ALTITUDES, barometric pressure and the partial oxygen pressure (PpO2) reduce by about 6% every 500m of elevation.

A very interesting study (J.Appl.Physiol. 1996;80:2204-2210) verified in laboratory how 11 elite cyclists (VO2max = 77ml/kg/min) presented an average decrease in their VO2max by 6.8% at an altitude of 580 m, compared to sea level values.

It is therefore opportune to consider also the average altitude of the climb when comparing VAM's obtained at different elevations; the intrinsic values of a VAM done on a climb starting at 200m asl and ending at 1200m asl (average altitude of 700m) and one done on a climb starting at 1000m asl and ending at 1800m asl (average altitude of 1400m) will differ greatly.

A difference in average altitude of 700m means a reduction of PpO2 of 8%.
In reality the performance on the road will "only" decrease by about 5%, because of a more rarefied air that reduces air drag for the cyclist and friction in respiration (less dense air).

I think it is reasonable to evaluate an average reduction in VAM values by approximately 3% every 500m of elevation, while still considering individual variations due to efficiency in pulmonary gaseous exchanges.

More from Training :
A bicycle's "performance" 1 Mar 2003
Clothing and Performance 6 Mar 2003
High Pedaling Cadence 10 Mar 2003
The riderís performance: how to measure it? 1 Mar 2003
Training Intensity Levels 17 Mar 2003
High RPM: further observations 13 May 2003
Over-Training in Sports 17 Jun 2003
Tapering 21 Oct 2003
Pedaling Cadences and Force Peaks 27 Nov 2003
The Lab is far from the Road 18 Feb 2004
Pedaling Efficiency is Crucial 5 May 2004
Pedal Stroke Efficiency 5 Jul 2004
Uphill Gradient and VAM 6 Dec 2004
Bad Days 10 Dec 2004
The Lipid Power 9 Jan 2005
Time Trial Races 26 Oct 2005
Engine Vs Tank 30 Nov 2005
Choosing the Cranks 5 Oct 2007
The Critical Power 6 Jan 2007
More about VAM 8 Jun 2007
Change in Training 1 Dec 2007
Winter Gym Sessions: Yes or No? 12 Dec 2008
VAM: Effects of Gradient & Altitude 19 Jun 2009
Numbers on Drafting 25 Jan 2011
Effect of Weight on Climbing 19 Jun 2011
Carbo Mouth Rinse 2 Nov 2011
Training at Altitude 19 Nov 2011
Too Much Training? 24 Mar 2012

Coaching is art
Our Coach
Dr. Michele Ferrari
Dr. Michele Ferrari
53x12 shop suggest

Graham Watson: 20 Years of Cycling Photographs

Buy >>

Feedback Site Map About 53x12.com Copyright notice