Go to My
Training Center


username:
  password:
 
Forgot your password?
What is My Training Center?

 
Training
Choosing the Cranks
By: Michele Ferrari
Published: 5 Oct 2007



The length of the cranks is one of the most controversial arguments among cycling specialists and connoisseurs.
Even in scientific literature there is no unanimous opinion on how to calculate the ideal measure for each cyclist.

How important is the length of the legs, the proportion between femur and tibia, the type of muscle fibers or the pedaling style?

- “Inseam” measure -

Usually measured with a carpenter’s square, 2 cm wide, positioned in the middle of a cyclist’s legs, standing against a wall, without shoes.
Try to position the square as high as possible, marking the height on the wall.
The measure already gives a first indication on the choice for the best cranks:

- from 75 to 80 cm "inseam" = 170mm crank length
- from 81 to 86 cm = 172.5mm
- from 87 to 92 cm = 175mm
- 93 cm and higher = 177.5mm

- Femur/tibia ratio -

Usually measured seated on a stool, properly adjusted in height so that the femur is parallel to the ground, the tibia is perpendicular, the feet are firmly on the floor and the lower back leans against the wall: measure the “femur” length from the wall to the most forward point in the kneecap, and the “tibia” length from the highest point in the kneecap all the way down to the floor.
If the ratio femur/tibia is superior to 1.13, it might be suggested a slightly longer crank (usually by 2.5mm) than the one indicated by the inseam measure.

- Type of muscle fibers -

A longer crank could be adopted by those riders who have predominance in red fibers (or Type I) and prefer high pedaling cadences, while suffering high force peaks.
A longer crank in facts requires, at a given power output, lower force peaks for each pedal stroke, due to the longer arm.
Those riders who have a higher percentage in white fibers (or Type II) instead, more used to bear high muscle tensions, could opt for shorter cranks, allowing inferior articular excursions and reducing internal friction.

- Pedaling Style-

Those cyclists who prefer to pedal mostly in a seated position, such as medium-large sized riders and rouleurs, might use longer cranks, while those cyclists who are often pedaling out-of-the-saddle, such as light-weight climbers, should avoid cranks that are too long.

If a rider wishes to change the length of the cranks on his bike, he should do it carefully, allowing time to adapt muscles, joints and tendons to the change, even though the history of cycling saw many champions using cranks that were 2.5mm or even 5mm longer than usual for a single mountain stage or a time trial.
Anquetil and Merckx were among them, while Hinault and Moser preferred never to change the same cranks (172.5mm) on all the courses

More from Training :
A bicycle's "performance" 1 Mar 2003
Clothing and Performance 6 Mar 2003
High Pedaling Cadence 10 Mar 2003
The rider’s performance: how to measure it? 1 Mar 2003
Training Intensity Levels 17 Mar 2003
High RPM: further observations 13 May 2003
Over-Training in Sports 17 Jun 2003
Tapering 21 Oct 2003
Pedaling Cadences and Force Peaks 27 Nov 2003
The Lab is far from the Road 18 Feb 2004
Pedaling Efficiency is Crucial 5 May 2004
Pedal Stroke Efficiency 5 Jul 2004
Uphill Gradient and VAM 6 Dec 2004
Bad Days 10 Dec 2004
The Lipid Power 9 Jan 2005
Time Trial Races 26 Oct 2005
Engine Vs Tank 30 Nov 2005
Choosing the Cranks 5 Oct 2007
The Critical Power 6 Jan 2007
More about VAM 8 Jun 2007
Change in Training 1 Dec 2007
Winter Gym Sessions: Yes or No? 12 Dec 2008
VAM: Effects of Gradient & Altitude 19 Jun 2009
Numbers on Drafting 25 Jan 2011
Effect of Weight on Climbing 19 Jun 2011
Carbo Mouth Rinse 2 Nov 2011
Training at Altitude 19 Nov 2011
Too Much Training? 24 Mar 2012


 
Coaching is art
Our Coach
Dr. Michele Ferrari
Dr. Michele Ferrari
53x12 shop suggest

Graham Watson: 20 Years of Cycling Photographs

Buy >>


Feedback Site Map About 53x12.com Copyright notice